Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arvid Nordquist vs Nathan Ponwith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nordquist vs Ponwith analysis and find out who is favored!
Arvid Nordquist vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nordquist has won 50.72% of points on his second serve, while Ponwith has won 53.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nordquist, in recent form, has won 50.76% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 47.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33% and 31.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nordquist has saved 58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 58.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nordquist has won 41.94% of matches played (W/L 13/ 18), with Ponwith winning 30.77% (W/L 16/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nordquist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 37/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Nordquist has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.94% of matches (W/L 13/ 18), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nordquist winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nordquist winning 2 and Ponwith winning 2. The last match between Nordquist and Ponwith was at the M15 Orange Park, 01-05-2024, First, Clay with Arvid Nordquist getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nordquist and Ponwith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nordquist winning 0 times and Ponwith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nordquist winning 0, and Ponwith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nordquist has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.81 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 187.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nordquist has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nordquist has converted 43.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 38.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nordquist 1 - 1 Ponwith
892
Rank
889
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
745
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
50% (117-117)
Career Total W/L
55% (167-134)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Arvid Nordquist | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 18 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (73/111) | 57% (65/114) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (48/73) | 75% (49/65) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (18/38) | 49% (24/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (41/114) | 41% (45/111) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Arvid Nordquist
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arvid Nordquist | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 40% (8/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 40% (18/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (124/102) | 47% (199/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:10 | 1:49:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 141.73 | 229.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (327/442) | 58% (804/1397) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (204/327) | 64% (517/804) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (58/115) | 53% (312/593) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (22/48) | 41% (47/115) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (184/438) | 38% (510/1333) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 46% (6/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (6/10) | 40% (8/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 17% (12/2) |
Arvid Nordquist Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Facundo Bermejo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Arvid Nordquist
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
80%
(
85 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Arvid Nordquist
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Matthew Segura
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 3-4 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Benson
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nordquist Vs Ponwith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nathan Ponwith
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
